<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political compass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/</link>
	<description>What's Next?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jan Hughes</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-14012</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-14012</guid>
		<description>So like my husband..
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.77 

At least we don't argue over politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So like my husband..<br />
Your political compass<br />
Economic Left/Right: -5.00<br />
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.77 </p>
<p>At least we don&#8217;t argue over politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12796</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12796</guid>
		<description>Economic Left/Right: -3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74

About where I was a few years ago, from memory ... and about where I'd expect to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economic Left/Right: -3.12<br />
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.74</p>
<p>About where I was a few years ago, from memory &#8230; and about where I&#8217;d expect to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Jania</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12435</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Jania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12435</guid>
		<description>Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.13

I'm not surprised at all... I'm economically centrist and socially liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economic Left/Right: 0.12<br />
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.13</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised at all&#8230; I&#8217;m economically centrist and socially liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12327</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12327</guid>
		<description>Reporting from the edge of nowhere in Arizona, USA:

Economic Left/Right: -4.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.82</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reporting from the edge of nowhere in Arizona, USA:</p>
<p>Economic Left/Right: -4.12<br />
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.82</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobS</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12311</link>
		<dc:creator>RobS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12311</guid>
		<description>Might as well pitch in as well :)

Economic Left/Right: -2.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.31</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might as well pitch in as well :)</p>
<p>Economic Left/Right: -2.88<br />
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.31</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12300</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 19:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12300</guid>
		<description>Economic Left/Right: -4.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.79</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economic Left/Right: -4.62<br />
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.79</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kellyd</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12108</link>
		<dc:creator>kellyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12108</guid>
		<description>Economic Left/Right: -5.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economic Left/Right: -5.50<br />
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pranab</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12066</link>
		<dc:creator>Pranab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12066</guid>
		<description>Economic Left/Right: 1.0,
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

Interesting to see the community results..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economic Left/Right: 1.0,<br />
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72</p>
<p>Interesting to see the community results..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferrier</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12046</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12046</guid>
		<description>@Richard, actually, you don't have to say anything bad about Gandhi. Wikipedia has already done it for you :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahatma_Gandhi#Criticism_and_controversies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard, actually, you don&#8217;t have to say anything bad about Gandhi. Wikipedia has already done it for you :)</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahatma_Gandhi#Criticism_and_controversies" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahatma_Gandhi#Criticism_and_controversies</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferrier</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12045</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Ferrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/09/02/political-compass/#comment-12045</guid>
		<description>@Roo, "I didn’t actually have a problem getting my head around that particular one. Since you ask, how about this: if you think economic globalisation should primarily serve humanity (whether or not that is done through corporations) I guess you’d agree. Alternatively, you might believe that economic globalisation should primarily serve the interests of corporations (regardless of whether those interests are humanity itself, something else at the expense of humanity, or indeed ignoring humanity altogether) in which case I imagine you’d disagree."

Well, I would work on the assumption that very few people would actually want globalisation (or pretty much anything else) to work against humanity (at least once their own needs and desires are fulfilled). Therefore pretty much anyone should answer yes to that question (and it's hence not that useful in a questionnaire). Instead, I think the part of the question about serving the interests of corporations reveals a lot about the person who wrote the question - i.e. that they think the world divides into those on the side of people, and those on the side of corporations ('Alec Baldwin' in Team America springs to mind here). I think those thought patterns do a disservice to the economic right, who (like Richard does with more patience than I) try to drive home the message that commerce, free-trade and business are beneficial to human beings.

Phew.

OK, time to get off my ranting high-horse and get on with some work :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roo, &#8220;I didn’t actually have a problem getting my head around that particular one. Since you ask, how about this: if you think economic globalisation should primarily serve humanity (whether or not that is done through corporations) I guess you’d agree. Alternatively, you might believe that economic globalisation should primarily serve the interests of corporations (regardless of whether those interests are humanity itself, something else at the expense of humanity, or indeed ignoring humanity altogether) in which case I imagine you’d disagree.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I would work on the assumption that very few people would actually want globalisation (or pretty much anything else) to work against humanity (at least once their own needs and desires are fulfilled). Therefore pretty much anyone should answer yes to that question (and it&#8217;s hence not that useful in a questionnaire). Instead, I think the part of the question about serving the interests of corporations reveals a lot about the person who wrote the question - i.e. that they think the world divides into those on the side of people, and those on the side of corporations (&#8217;Alec Baldwin&#8217; in Team America springs to mind here). I think those thought patterns do a disservice to the economic right, who (like Richard does with more patience than I) try to drive home the message that commerce, free-trade and business are beneficial to human beings.</p>
<p>Phew.</p>
<p>OK, time to get off my ranting high-horse and get on with some work :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
