<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here Comes Another Bubble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/</link>
	<description>What&#039;s Next?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:16:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-25671</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/#comment-25671</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/12/16/photographer_takes_down_bubble_20_fun.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s the story behind the take-down from YouTube. In short, &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/fetching/2090802706/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lane Hartwell&lt;/a&gt; objected to the unattributed use of one of her photos.
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.richterscales.com/blog/2007/12/dmca-takedown-of-here-comes-another.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Richter Scales&lt;/a&gt; have acknowledged this and promised to provide all of the appropriate attribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/12/16/photographer_takes_down_bubble_20_fun.html" rel="nofollow">Here</a>&#8216;s the story behind the take-down from YouTube. In short, <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/fetching/2090802706/" rel="nofollow">Lane Hartwell</a> objected to the unattributed use of one of her photos.<br />
The <a href="http://www.richterscales.com/blog/2007/12/dmca-takedown-of-here-comes-another.php" rel="nofollow">Richter Scales</a> have acknowledged this and promised to provide all of the appropriate attribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roo</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-24903</link>
		<dc:creator>Roo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/#comment-24903</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Switching over &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metacafe.com/watch/958560/here_comes_another_bubble&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Metacafe version&lt;/a&gt;, for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Switching over <a href="http://www.metacafe.com/watch/958560/here_comes_another_bubble" rel="nofollow">the Metacafe version</a>, for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-24874</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/#comment-24874</guid>
		<description>Looks like it&#039;s been DCMAd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it&#8217;s been DCMAd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyb</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-24522</link>
		<dc:creator>kyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/#comment-24522</guid>
		<description>United States Supreme Court, Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (1994) probably about covers it.  Although, the fact that it wasn&#039;t commenting on or criticising the original We Didn&#039;t Start the Fire could perhaps count against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>United States Supreme Court, Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (1994) probably about covers it.  Although, the fact that it wasn&#8217;t commenting on or criticising the original We Didn&#8217;t Start the Fire could perhaps count against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roo</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-24510</link>
		<dc:creator>Roo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/#comment-24510</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t speak for Stablio, but I do know that many of the logo owners were delighted to be included in that collection. You have a point though.

Re Billy Joel, I&#039;m not sure how far &#039;fair use&#039; takes you, but doesn&#039;t it make allowances for parody?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak for Stablio, but I do know that many of the logo owners were delighted to be included in that collection. You have a point though.</p>
<p>Re Billy Joel, I&#8217;m not sure how far &#8216;fair use&#8217; takes you, but doesn&#8217;t it make allowances for parody?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Rogers</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-24507</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/#comment-24507</guid>
		<description>Further to your observation: What really impresses me is that (a) Stablio Boss didn&#039;t infringe anyone&#039;s copyright and (b) Billy Joel&#039;s music for We Didn&#039;t Start the Fire is presumably available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share-alike. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to your observation: What really impresses me is that (a) Stablio Boss didn&#8217;t infringe anyone&#8217;s copyright and (b) Billy Joel&#8217;s music for We Didn&#8217;t Start the Fire is presumably available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share-alike. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Taylor</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-24439</link>
		<dc:creator>James Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/#comment-24439</guid>
		<description>Blogging about the song was my favourite line too - great song :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogging about the song was my favourite line too &#8211; great song :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyb</title>
		<link>http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-24394</link>
		<dc:creator>kyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rooreynolds.com/2007/12/09/here-comes-another-bubble/#comment-24394</guid>
		<description>I like the recursion in &quot;won&#039;t you blog about this song&quot;.  Fantastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the recursion in &#8220;won&#8217;t you blog about this song&#8221;.  Fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

